Key information

  1. Status: Approved for delivery (available for starts)
  2. Reference: ST1320
  3. Version: 1.1
  4. Level: 4
  5. Typical duration to gateway: 24 months
  6. Typical EPA period: 5 months
  7. Maximum funding: £11000
  8. Route: Agriculture, environmental and animal care
  9. Integration: None
  10. Date updated: 18/11/2024
  11. Approved for delivery: 29 August 2023
  12. Lars code: 726
  13. EQA provider: Ofqual
  14. Review: this apprenticeship will be reviewed in accordance with our change request policy.
Content loading...
Content loading...

End-point assessment plan

V1.1

Introduction and overview

This document explains the requirements for end-point assessment (EPA) for the assistant farm manager apprenticeship. End-point assessment organisations (EPAOs) must follow this when designing and delivering the EPA.

Assistant farm manager apprentices, their employers and training providers should read this document.

A full-time assistant farm manager apprentice typically spends 24 months on-programme (this means in training before the gateway). The apprentice must spend at least 12 months on-programme and complete the required amount of off-the-job training in line with the apprenticeship funding rules.

The apprentice must complete their training and meet the gateway requirements before starting their EPA. The EPA will assess occupational competence.

An approved EPAO must conduct the EPA for this apprenticeship. Employers must select an approved EPAO from the register of end-point assessment organisations (RoEPAO).

This EPA has 3 assessment methods.

The grades available for each assessment method are below.

Assessment method 1 - business case assignment with questioning:

  • fail

  • pass

  • distinction

Assessment method 2 - professional discussion underpinned by a portfolio:

  • fail

  • pass

  • distinction

Assessment method 3 - farm or horticultural site walk (underpinned by portfolio):

  • fail

  • pass

  • distinction

The result from each assessment method is combined to decide the overall apprenticeship grade. The following grades are available for the apprenticeship:

  • fail

  • pass

  • merit

  • distinction

EPA summary table

Content loading...

Duration of end-point assessment period

The EPA is taken in the EPA period. The EPA period starts when the EPAO confirms the gateway requirements have been met and is typically 5 months.

The EPAO should confirm the gateway requirements have been met and the EPA should start as quickly as possible.

EPA gateway

The apprentice’s employer must be content that the apprentice has attained sufficient KSBs to complete the apprenticeship. The employer may take advice from the apprentice's training provider, but the employer must make the decision. The apprentice will then enter the gateway.

The apprentice must meet the gateway requirements before starting their EPA.

They must:

  • confirm they are ready to take the EPA
  • have achieved English and mathematics qualifications in line with the apprenticeship funding rules

  • have passed Level 3 award or training and assessment in emergency first aid at work minimum 3 day course (face-to-face), carried out by either an awarding organisation, a UKAS accredited trade body or voluntary aid society recognised by government as specified in HSE document GEIS 3.

    • have passed Lantra Awards Level 2 Award in Safe Use of Pesticides OR City & Guilds Level 2 Principles of safe handling and application of pesticides

      • have passed Lantra Awards Level 2 Award in the Safe Application of Pesticide Using Hand Held Equipment OR City & Guilds Level 2 Award In The Safe Application of Pesticides Using Pedestrian Hand Held Equipment
      • submit a portfolio of evidence for the professional discussion underpinned by a portfolio

      Portfolio of evidence requirements for the Professional Discussion:

      The apprentice must compile a portfolio of evidence during the on-programme period of the apprenticeship. It should only contain evidence related to the KSBs that will be assessed by this assessment method. It will typically contain 15 discrete pieces of evidence. Evidence must be mapped against the KSBs. Evidence may be used to demonstrate more than one KSB; a qualitative as opposed to quantitative approach is suggested.

      Evidence sources may include:

      • workplace documentation and records, for example:
      • workplace policies and procedures
      • witness statements
      • annotated photographs
      • video clips (maximum total duration 10 minutes); the apprentice must be in view and identifiable

      This is not a definitive list; other evidence sources can be included.

      The portfolio of evidence should not include reflective accounts or any methods of self-assessment. Any employer contributions should focus on direct observation of performance (for example, witness statements) rather than opinions. The evidence provided should be valid and attributable to the apprentice; the portfolio of evidence should contain a statement from the employer and apprentice confirming this.

      The EPAO should not assess the portfolio of evidence directly as it underpins the discussion ]. The independent assessor should review the portfolio of evidence to prepare questions for the discussion . They are not required to provide feedback after this review.

      • submit a portfolio of evidence for the farm or horticultural site walk (underpinned by portfolio)

      Portfolio of evidence requirements for the Site Walk:

      The apprentice must compile a portfolio of evidence during the on-programme period of the apprenticeship. It should only contain evidence related to the KSBs that will be assessed by this assessment method. It will typically contain 10 discrete pieces of evidence. Evidence must be mapped against the KSBs. Evidence may be used to demonstrate more than one KSB; a qualitative as opposed to quantitative approach is suggested.

      Evidence sources may include:

      • workplace documentation and records, for example:
      • workplace policies and procedures
      • witness statements
      • annotated photographs
      • video clips (maximum total duration 10 minutes); the apprentice must be in view and identifiable

      This is not a definitive list; other evidence sources can be included.

      The portfolio of evidence should not include reflective accounts or any methods of self-assessment. Any employer contributions should focus on direct observation of performance (for example, witness statements) rather than opinions. The evidence provided should be valid and attributable to the apprentice; the portfolio of evidence should contain a statement from the employer and apprentice confirming this.

      The EPAO should not assess the portfolio of evidence directly as it underpins the discussion. The independent assessor should review the portfolio of evidence to prepare questions for the discussion. They are not required to provide feedback after this review.

      The apprentice must submit the gateway evidence to their EPAO, including any organisation specific policies and procedures requested by the EPAO.

Order of assessment methods

The assessment methods can be delivered in any order.

The result of one assessment method does not need to be known before starting the next.

Business Case Assignment with Questioning

Overview

A business case assignment involves the apprentice completing a significant and defined piece of work that has a real business application and benefit. The business case assignment must meet the needs of the employer’s business and be relevant to the apprentice’s occupation and apprenticeship.

This assessment method has 2 components:

  • Business case assignment report

  • Question and answer session

Together, these components give the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this assessment method. They are assessed by an independent assessor.

Rationale

This assessment method is being used because:

This will enable a number of KSBs to be demonstrated holistically, covering business, research and ability to apply technical knowledge to make recommendations. These skills will focus on the forward looking development of the business and in doing so build upon the assessment in the farm walk and the professional discussion that concentrate on the daily management of the farm.

At this level, it will allow the apprentice to demonstrate their ability to propose a change to business procedures or planning, using sound evidence as would be expected of the role. It enables them to demonstrate they can independently complete a piece of work from start to finish which would take too long to demonstrate as a traditional practical test or observation.

Delivery

The apprentice must complete an outline business case report based on any of the following:

  • the use of farm or horticultural site information and research to evaluate potential improvements to current working practices, products or services.

The Apprentice will need to:

  • synthesise their learning to generate a broad understanding of the business or enterprise, its operation and market place
  • research potential improvements to the business or enterprise
  • evaluate the risks and potential benefits of any improvements to be recommended
  • produce a formal written business case to organise and structure their proposals

To ensure the assignment allows the apprentice to meet the KSBs mapped to this assessment method to the highest available grade, the EPAO should sign-off the assignment’s title and scope at the gateway to confirm it is suitable. The EPAO must refer to the grading descriptors to ensure that assignments are pitched appropriately.

The assignment output must be in the form of a business case.

The apprentice must start the assignment after the gateway. The employer should ensure the apprentice has the time and resources, within the business case assignment period, to plan and complete their business case report.

The apprentice may work as part of a team to complete the assignment, which could include internal colleagues or technical experts. The apprentice must however, complete their business case unaided and it must be reflective of their own role and contribution. The apprentice and their employer must confirm this when the business case is submitted.

Component 1: Business case report

The business case report must include at least:

  • Brief overview of the business (for example links to business strategy or business plan)
  • Detail of the product or service under review (for example overview of what it is, current performance using business data, staffing levels, inputs)
  • Detail of proposed change (for example what is the nature of the change? Is it a new product or service? Change to production quality, rates, efficiency or costs?)
  • Benefit and impact analysis of the proposed change (for example, description of the major strengths and risks).
  • Implementation plan for proposed change and modifications to existing production plans and planning monitoring of results (for example physical or technological changes, capital and staff costs for both implementation and running, infrastructure or machinery implications)
  • Financial analysis to support proposed changes (for example costs of implementation, depreciation on any new equipment, impacts on rates, volume or costs of production, financial cost flow for introduction and running, impact on income or savings, return on investment)
  • Risk analysis and mitigation
  • Detail of any unique selling points of change
  • Overall recommendation
  • Citation of evidence sources
  • Appendices

The business case must have a word count of 2500 words. A tolerance of 10% above or below is allowed at the apprentice’s discretion. Appendices, references and diagrams are not included in this total. The apprentice must produce and include a mapping in an appendix, showing how the business case evidences the KSBs mapped to this assessment method.

The apprentice must complete and submit the business case to the EPAO by the end of week 6 of the EPA period.

Component 2: Question and answer session

The question and answer session must be structured to give the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this assessment method to the highest available grade.

The apprentice must be questioned about their business case assignment.

The question and answer session must last for 30 minutes. The independent assessor must use the full time available for questioning and they can increase the total time by up to 10%. This time is to allow the apprentice to respond to a question if necessary.

The independent assessor must ask at least 6 questions. They must use the questions from their EPAO’s question bank or create their own questions in line with the EPAO’s training. Follow up questions are allowed where clarification is required.

The purpose of the independent assessor's questions is:

  • to verify that the activity was completed by the apprentice
  • to seek clarification where required
  • to assess those KSBs that the apprentice did not have the opportunity to demonstrate with the business case, although these should be kept to a minimum
  • to assess level of competence against the grading descriptors

The independent assessor must have at least 3 weeks to review the business case before the question and answer session, to allow them to prepare questions.

The apprentice must be given at least 14 days’ notice of the question and answer session.

Assessment decision

The independent assessor must make the grading decision. They must assess the business case components holistically when deciding the grade.

The independent assessor must keep accurate records of the assessment. They must record:

  • the KSBs demonstrated in the business case and question and answer session
  • the apprentice’s answers to questions
  • the grade achieved

Assessment location

The question and answer session must take place in a suitable venue selected by the EPAO for example, the EPAO’s or employer’s premises. It should take place in a quiet room, free from distractions and influence.

The question and answer session can be conducted by video conferencing. The EPAO must have processes in place to verify the identity of the apprentice and ensure the apprentice is not being aided.

Question and resource development

The EPAO must develop a purpose-built assessment specification and question bank. It is recommended this is done in consultation with employers of this occupation. The EPAO should maintain the security and confidentiality of EPA materials when consulting with employers. The assessment specification and question bank must be reviewed at least once a year to ensure they remain fit-for-purpose.

The assessment specification must be relevant to the occupation and demonstrate how to assess the KSBs mapped to this assessment method. The EPAO must ensure that questions are refined and developed to a high standard. The questions must be unpredictable. A question bank of sufficient size will support this.

The EPAO must ensure that the apprentice has a different set of questions in the case of re-sits or re-takes.

EPAO must produce the following materials to support the business case assignment:

  • independent assessor EPA materials which include:
    • training materials
    • administration materials
    • moderation and standardisation materials
    • guidance materials
    • grading guidance
    • question bank
  • EPA guidance for the apprentice and the employer

The EPAO must ensure that the EPA materials are subject to quality assurance procedures including standardisation and moderation.

Professional discussion underpinned by a portfolio

Overview

In the professional discussion, an independent assessor and apprentice have a formal two-way conversation. It gives the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this assessment method.

The apprentice can refer to and illustrate their answers with evidence from their portfolio of evidence.

Rationale

This assessment method is being used because:

  • it allows for the assessment of KSBs that do not occur on a predictable or regular basis for example seasonal tasks.
  • it allows the apprentice to be assessed against skills and behaviours which may not naturally occur during the other assessment methods
  • it enables the apprentice to demonstrate the application of skills and behaviours as well as knowledge
  • it allows scope for the apprentice to demonstrate the depth and breadth of KSBs

Delivery

The professional discussion must be structured to give the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this assessment method to the highest available grade.

An independent assessor must conduct and assess the professional discussion.

The purpose is to assess the apprentice’s competence against the following themes:

The EPAO must give an apprentice 14 days' notice of the professional discussion.

The independent assessor must have at least 2 weeks to review the supporting documentation.

The apprentice must have access to their portfolio of evidence during the professional discussion.

The apprentice can refer to and illustrate their answers with evidence from their portfolio of evidence however, the portfolio of evidence is not directly assessed.

The professional discussion must last for 75 minutes. The independent assessor can increase the time of the professional discussion by up to 10%. This time is to allow the apprentice to respond to a question if necessary.

The independent assessor must ask at least 15 questions. The independent assessor must use the questions from the EPAO’s question bank or create their own questions in line with the EPAO’s training. Follow-up questions are allowed where clarification is required.

The independent assessor must make the grading decision.

The independent assessor must keep accurate records of the assessment. They must record:

  • the apprentice’s answers to questions
  • the KSBs demonstrated in answers to questions
  • the grade achieved 

Assessment location

The professional discussion must take place in a suitable venue selected by the EPAO for example, the EPAO’s or employer’s premises.

The professional discussion can be conducted by video conferencing. The EPAO must have processes in place to verify the identity of the apprentice and ensure the apprentice is not being aided.

The professional discussion should take place in a quiet room, free from distractions and influence.

Question and resource development

The EPAO must develop a purpose-built assessment specification and question bank. It is recommended this is done in consultation with employers of this occupation. The EPAO should maintain the security and confidentiality of EPA materials when consulting with employers. The assessment specification and question bank must be reviewed at least once a year to ensure they remain fit-for-purpose.

The assessment specification must be relevant to the occupation and demonstrate how to assess the KSBs mapped to this assessment method. The EPAO must ensure that questions are refined and developed to a high standard. The questions must be unpredictable. A question bank of sufficient size will support this.

The EPAO must ensure that apprentice has a different set of questions in the case of re-sits or re-takes.

The EPAO must produce the following materials to support the professional discussion underpinned by a portfolio:

  • independent assessor assessment materials which include:
    • training materials
    • administration materials
    • moderation and standardisation materials
    • guidance materials
    • grading guidance
    • question bank
  • EPA guidance for the apprentice and the employer

The EPAO must ensure that the EPA materials are subject to quality assurance procedures including standardisation and moderation.

Farm or horticultural site walk (underpinned by portfolio)

Overview

In the site walk, an independent assessor and apprentice have a formal two-way conversation. It gives the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this assessment method.

The apprentice can refer to and illustrate their answers with evidence from their portfolio of evidence.

Rationale

This assessment method is being used because:

  • It puts the apprentice at ease, whilst also replicating a situation that might arise in the course of their work – walking with an outside expert explaining their workplace
  • It enables the apprentice to demonstrate the application of skills and behaviours as well as knowledge
  • It allows scope for the apprentice to demonstrate the depth and breadth of KSBs

Delivery

The site walk must be structured to give the apprentice the opportunity to demonstrate the KSBs mapped to this assessment method to the highest available grade.

An independent assessor must conduct and assess the site walk.

The purpose is to assess the apprentice’s competence against the following themes:

  • science
  • soil management
  • animal or plant health
  • environment
  • by-products and waste
  • health, safety and welfare
  • machinery and infrastructure

The EPAO must give an apprentice 14 days' notice of the site walk.

The independent assessor must have at least 2 weeks to review the supporting documentation.

The apprentice must have access to their portfolio of evidence during the site walk.

The apprentice can refer to and illustrate their answers with evidence from their portfolio of evidence however, the portfolio of evidence is not directly assessed.

The site walk must last for 90 minutes. The independent assessor can increase the time of the site walk by up to 10%. This time is to allow the apprentice to respond to a question if necessary.

Travel time between different areas within the farm or horticultural site should not be included in the duration, as this may vary considerably between sites.

The independent assessor must ask at least 15 questions. The independent assessor must use the questions from the EPAO’s question bank or create their own questions in line with the EPAO’s training. Follow-up questions are allowed where clarification is required.

The independent assessor must make the grading decision.

The independent assessor must keep accurate records of the assessment. They must record:

  • the apprentice’s answers to questions
  • the KSBs demonstrated in answers to questions
  • the grade achieved 

Assessment location

The site walk must take place at the employer's premises.

Question and resource development

The EPAO must develop a purpose-built assessment specification and question bank. It is recommended this is done in consultation with employers of this occupation. The EPAO should maintain the security and confidentiality of EPA materials when consulting with employers. The assessment specification and question bank must be reviewed at least once a year to ensure they remain fit-for-purpose.

The assessment specification must be relevant to the occupation and demonstrate how to assess the KSBs mapped to this assessment method. The EPAO must ensure that questions are refined and developed to a high standard. The questions must be unpredictable. A question bank of sufficient size will support this.

The EPAO must ensure that apprentice has a different set of questions in the case of re-sits or re-takes.

The EPAO must produce the following materials to support the farm or horticultural site walk (underpinned by portfolio):

  • independent assessor assessment materials which include:
    • training materials
    • administration materials
    • moderation and standardisation materials
    • guidance materials
    • grading guidance
    • question bank
  • EPA guidance for the apprentice and the employer

The EPAO must ensure that the EPA materials are subject to quality assurance procedures including standardisation and moderation.

Grading

Content loading...

Overall EPA grading

Performance in the EPA determines the overall grade of:

  • fail

  • pass

  • merit

  • distinction

An independent assessor must individually grade the business case assignment with questioning, professional discussion underpinned by a portfolio and farm or horticultural site walk (underpinned by portfolio) in line with this EPA plan.

The EPAO must combine the individual assessment method grades to determine the overall EPA grade.

If the apprentice fails one assessment method or more, they will be awarded an overall fail.

To achieve an overall pass, the apprentice must achieve at least a pass in all the assessment methods. In order to achieve an overall EPA ‘merit’, apprentices must achieve at least 2 distinctions and one pass in any of the assessment methods. In order to achieve a 'distinction', they would need to attain a distinction in all 3 methods.

Grades from individual assessment methods must be combined in the following way to determine the grade of the EPA overall.

Content loading...

Re-sits and re-takes

If the apprentice fails one assessment method or more, they can take a re-sit or a re-take at their employer’s discretion. The apprentice’s employer needs to agree that a re-sit or re-take is appropriate. A re-sit does not need further learning, whereas a re-take does. The apprentice should have a supportive action plan to prepare for a re-sit or a re-take.

The employer and the EPAO should agree the timescale for a re-sit or re-take. A re-sit is typically taken within 2 months of the EPA outcome notification. The timescale for a re-take is dependent on how much re-training is required and is typically taken within 5 months of the EPA outcome notification.

If the apprentice fails the business case assessment method, they must amend the business case output in line with the independent assessor’s feedback. The apprentice will be given 4 weeks to rework and submit the amended business case.

Failed assessment methods must be re-sat or re-taken within a 6-month period from the EPA outcome notification, otherwise the entire EPA will need to be re-sat or re-taken in full.

Re-sits and re-takes are not offered to an apprentice wishing to move from pass to a higher grade.

The apprentice will get a maximum EPA grade of pass for a re-sit or re-take, unless the EPAO determines there are exceptional circumstances.

Roles and responsibilities

Content loading...

Reasonable adjustments

The EPAO must have reasonable adjustments arrangements for the EPA.

This should include:

  • how an apprentice qualifies for reasonable adjustment
  • what reasonable adjustments may be made

Adjustments must maintain the validity, reliability and integrity of the EPA as outlined in this EPA plan.

Internal quality assurance

Internal quality assurance refers to the strategies, policies and procedures that an EPAO must have in place to ensure valid, consistent and reliable EPA decisions.

EPAOs for this EPA must adhere to the requirements within the roles and responsibilities table.

They must also appoint independent assessors who:

  • have recent relevant experience of the occupation or sector (including farm management) to at least occupational level 4 gained in the last 2 years or significant experience of the occupation or sector being assessed.
  • meet the following minimum requirements:
    • a recognised qualification and proven competence in assessment
    • correct and up-to-date cpd record relevant to the role being assessed

Value for money

Affordability of the EPA will be aided by using at least some of the following:

  • utilising digital remote platforms to conduct applicable assessment methods
  • using the employer’s premises
  • conducting assessment methods on the same day

Professional recognition

This apprenticeship is not aligned to professional recognition.

KSB mapping table

Content loading...

Mapping of KSBs to grade themes

Content loading...
Employers involved in creating the standard: BHG Farms, Brimstone farm, Cranswick Country Foods, East Durham College, Harper Adams University, Hartpury College, Karro Food Group, Kendall College, Lantra, LKL Farming, Myerscough College , NFU, Plumpton College, R and J Snook, Westover Farm, Reaseheath College, Skern Training and Skills, Tetworth Farms, Wiltshire college

Version log

Version Change detail Earliest start date Latest start date
1.1 Occupational standard and end-point assessment revised 18/11/2024 Not set
1.0 Approved for delivery 29/08/2023 17/11/2024

Crown copyright © 2025. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence

Is this webpage useful?

Thank you for your feedback

Tell us about your experience

Tell us about your experience

Were you successful in/​did you complete what you came to the website for today?
Yes
No
 
How easy was it to do what you came to the website for today?
Very easy
Easy
Neither easy nor difficult
Difficult
Very difficult
 
 
Overall, how satisfied are you with the IFATE today?
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Very unsatisfied
 

Alternatively you can contact us, If you would like a response to your experience

Institute for apprenticeships and technical education logo

Report a problem with this webpage

 
 
 

Alternatively you can contact us if you would like a response to your experience.